United States v. Cedillo-Menjivar

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Cedillo-Menjivar

319 F. App'x 827

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedMarch 18, 2009

DocketNo. 08-14892

StatusPublished

This text of 319 F. App'x 827 (United States v. Cedillo-Menjivar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Cedillo-Menjivar, 319 F. App'x 827 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David J. Joffe, appointed counsel for Marco Santiago Cedillo-Menjivar, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cedillo-Menjivar’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

David J. Joffe, appointed counsel for Marco Santiago Cedillo-Menjivar, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Cedillo-Menjivar’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

319 F. App'x 827, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cedillo-menjivar-ca11-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack