United States v. Cedeno-Relle

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided April 2, 1998·No. 97-2024·Unpublished

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

No. 97-2024

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

CUNELIO CEDENO-RELLE,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

[Hon. Paul J. Barbadoro, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Boudin, Circuit Judge, Coffin, Senior Circuit Judge, and Lynch, Circuit Judge.

Lazar Lowinger, J.D. on brief for appellant. Paul M. Gagnon, United States Attorney, and Peter E. Papps, First Assistant U.S. Attorney, on Government's Motion for Summary Disposition for appellee.

MARCH 31, 1998

Per Curiam. We have carefully reviewed the record in this case, including the briefs of the parties. We find no abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of the motion for a new trial. Therefore, the denial of the motion is summarilyaffirmed. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cedeno-Relle, (1st Cir. 1998).

United States v. Cedeno-Relle (United States v. Cedeno-Relle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.