United States v. Cecil Schultz Sr.

159 F. App'x 743
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 21, 2005·No. 05-1866·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Cecil Eugene Schultz, Sr. appeals the 120-month sentence the district court * imposed after Schultz pleaded guilty to a drug-conspiracy charge. Shultz argues an evidentiary hearing is necessary to determine if his coconspirators had indeed pleaded guilty when the government denied him an opportunity to earn a substantial-assistance reduction by providing information. We conclude Schultz failed to make a substantial threshold showing that the government’s refusal was “irrational, in bad faith, or based on an unconstitutional motive.” See United States v. Davis, 397 F.3d 672, 676 (8th Cir.2005) (per curiam) (quoting United States v. Lieona-Lopez, 163 F.3d 1040, 1042 (1998)). Accordingly, we affirm.

*

The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cecil Schultz Sr., 159 F. App'x 743 (8th Cir. 2005).

159 F. App'x 743 (United States v. Cecil Schultz Sr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Evin Alexi Licona-Lopez
163 F.3d 1040 (Eighth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Christopher Mark Davis
397 F.3d 672 (Eighth Circuit, 2005)