United States v. Ceballos-Torres

226 F.3d 651, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 22502, 2000 WL 1262614
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ceballos-Torres. Read the opinion of the Court — 218 F.3d 409
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 6, 2000·No. 99-20856·Published

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, JOLLY and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:

The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the court and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor, (Fed. R. App. P. and 5th Cir. R. 35) the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

The Petition for Rehearing is GRANTED as follows: (1) Footnote eight is deleted; and (2) in the final paragraph of Section H.B., the fourth sentence is changed to read: “It was possessed illegally.”

In all other respects, the Petition for Rehearing with respect to this published opinion is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ceballos-Torres, 226 F.3d 651, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 22502, 2000 WL 1262614 (5th Cir. 2000).

226 F.3d 651 (United States v. Ceballos-Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.