United States v. Catarino Capatillo Gutierrez

560 F.2d 195, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11373
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 28, 1977
Docket77-5081
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 560 F.2d 195 (United States v. Catarino Capatillo Gutierrez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Catarino Capatillo Gutierrez, 560 F.2d 195, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11373 (5th Cir. 1977).

Opinion

*196 PER CURIAM:

This appeal is taken from a jury conviction for possession of 292 pounds of marijuana with intent to distribute, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). The appellant contends that the checkpoint, seven miles south of Falfurrias, Texas, where he was stopped for a citizenship check, has not previously been adjudicated to be a permanent checkpoint. This Court’s jurisprudence shows otherwise. United States v. Kalie, 5 Cir. 1976, 538 F.2d 1201, 1202, n.l; also, United States v. Andrade, 5 Cir. 1977, 545 F.2d 1032; United States v. Diaz, 5 Cir. 1976, 541 F.2d 1165; United States v. Garza, 5 Cir. 1976, 539 F.2d 381.

The appellant also contends that the odor which the officer believed to be marijuana did not provide probable cause to search the vehicle. The odor of marijuana emanating from a vehicle constitutes probable cause to search. United States v. Torres, 5 Cir. 1976, 537 F.2d 1299; United States v. Andrade, supra; United States v. Diaz, supra.

He also contends that the officer’s testimony should not have been admitted because he was not qualified as an expert as to the odor of marijuana. Since the appellant did not object to the officers qualifications, and since the testimony involved does not constitute clear error, the issue is waived. Rule 51, F.R.Cr.P; United States v. Fendley, 5 Cir. 1975, 522 F.2d 181, 185-86; United States v. Maddox, 5 Cir. 1974, 492 F.2d 104, cert. denied 419 U.S. 851, 95 S.Ct. 92, 42 L.Ed.2d 82. The judgment below is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Oyarzun
582 F. Supp. 121 (W.D. Texas, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
560 F.2d 195, 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 11373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-catarino-capatillo-gutierrez-ca5-1977.