United States v. Cataldo, Gilbert

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided April 18, 2003·No. 02-1702·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

April 18, 2003

Before

Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge Nos. 02-1702, 02-1726 & 02-1925

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeals from the United States Plaintiff-Appellee/ District Court for the Cross-Appellant, Northern District of Illinois, v. Eastern Division.

JOHN SERPICO and GILBERT No. 99 CR 570 CATALDO, Defendants-Appellants/ Blanche M. Manning, Judge.

Cross-Appellees.

ORDER

John Serpico’s petition for panel rehearing is DENIED. The court’s February 20, 2003, opinion is AMENDED as follows:

–on page 1, the word “Bud” is stricken.

–on page 10, the last sentence of the last full paragraph is amended to read:

Therefore, the district court should have sentenced Serpico and Cataldo under §2E5.1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cataldo, Gilbert, (7th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Cataldo, Gilbert (United States v. Cataldo, Gilbert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.