United States v. Castro-Sanchez

224 F. App'x 408
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 5, 2007
Docket06-51165
StatusUnpublished

This text of 224 F. App'x 408 (United States v. Castro-Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Castro-Sanchez, 224 F. App'x 408 (5th Cir. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Cesar Omar Castro-Sanchez raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Esparza-Gonzalez, 268 F.3d 272, 273-74 (5th Cir.2001), which held that the district court’s failure to verify that the defendant and his counsel had read and discussed the presentence report did not require an automatic reversal. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Esparza-Gonzalez
268 F.3d 272 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 F. App'x 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-castro-sanchez-ca5-2007.