United States v. Castro
This text of United States v. Castro (United States v. Castro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-50783 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SIMON CASTRO, JR., Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (W-02-CR-21-1) -------------------- February 13, 2003
Before DAVIS, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Simon Castro, Jr., has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Castro has not filed a
response. Our independent review of the brief and record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, the motion for leave to
withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.
R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Castro, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-castro-ca5-2003.