United States v. Castro

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 14, 2000
Docket00-40100
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Castro (United States v. Castro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Castro, (5th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40100 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROLAND CASTRO,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-99-CR-289-1 -------------------- September 14, 2000

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roland Castro appeals his conviction for being a felon in

possession of a firearm. He argues that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)

“operates unconstitutionally in a case where the only interstate

commerce nexus is the mere fact that the firearms at some point

in the past traveled interstate.” He also argues that the

evidence adduced at trial gives nearly equal circumstantial

support for a theory of guilt as a theory of innocence;

therefore, reversal is required.

Castro’s timely post-verdict motion for a judgment of

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-40100 -2-

acquittal preserves his right to appellate review of his

insufficient-evidence claim. See United States v. Allison, 616

F.2d 779, 783-84 (5th Cir. 1980).

We review the district court’s denial of the motion de novo.

United States v. Ferguson, 211 F.3d 878, 882 (5th Cir. 2000).

“This court has repeatedly emphasized that the

constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) is not open to question.” See

United States v. De Leon, 170 F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 120 S. Ct. 156 (1999). Recent decisions by the Supreme

Court do not alter this ruling. Moreover, the jury could

reasonably find that the black object which fell from Castro’s

pocket was the gun that was recovered a short time later. The

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ferguson
211 F.3d 878 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Thomas De Leon
170 F.3d 494 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Castro, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-castro-ca5-2000.