United States v. Castorena-Curiel
This text of 8 F. App'x 714 (United States v. Castorena-Curiel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM2
Miguel Castorena-Curiel appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy, possession of false identification documents and illegal entry into the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371 and 1028(a)(3) and 8 U.S.C. § 1325(a).
Castorena-Curiel’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw on the ground that he could find no meritorious issues on appeal. Castorena-Curiel did not file a pro se supplemental brief.
In the plea agreement, Castorena-Curiel agreed to waive his constitutional and statutory rights to appeal his sentence as long as the sentence was within the statutory maximum, the court did not depart upward more than two levels and the total [715]*715offense level was 22 or below. The sentence imposed is within these conditions.
Because our independent review of the record indicates that the plea agreement, including the waiver of the right to appeal, was entered knowingly and voluntarily, United States v. Aguilar-Muniz, 156 F.3d 974, 976 (9th Cir.1998) (waiver of right to appeal is valid if knowing and voluntary), we enforce the waiver, grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and dismiss the appeal.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 F. App'x 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-castorena-curiel-ca9-2001.