United States v. Castillo-Hernandez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Castillo-Hernandez. Read the opinion of the Court — 87 F. App'x 949
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 24, 2006·No. 05-40629·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40629 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN CASTILLO HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CR-910-ALL --------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender representing Juan Castillo

Hernandez has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief as required

by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Castillo Hernandez

has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s

brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL

IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Castillo-Hernandez, (5th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Castillo-Hernandez (United States v. Castillo-Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)