United States v. Castillo-Garcia
This text of 70 F. App'x 465 (United States v. Castillo-Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Gerardo Castillo-Garcia appeals the one-year term of supervised release imposed after he pleaded guilty to unlawful entry and failure to register with immigration officials, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1302(a), 1306(a), and 1325(a)(2). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
The district court’s decision to impose supervised release constitutes a discretionary refusal to depart downward from the Sentencing Guidelines. See United States v. Chinske, 978 F.2d 557, 559 (9th Cir.1992). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to review Castillo-Garcia’s contention that the district court erred by imposing a supervised release term based on a factor not included in 18 U.S.C. §§ 3583(a) & (c). See United States v. Wetchie, 207 F.3d 632, 636 (9th Cir.2000) (“[A] discretionary refusal to depart downward is not reviewable in this court.”).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
70 F. App'x 465, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-castillo-garcia-ca9-2003.