United States v. Castillo

562 F. App'x 218
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 10, 2014·No. Nos. 13-40766, 13-40778·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Suhaily Castillo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Castillo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeals are DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Castillo, 562 F. App'x 218 (5th Cir. 2014).

562 F. App'x 218 (United States v. Castillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)