United States v. Castillo

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Castillo. Read the opinion of the Court — 386 F.3d 632
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 24, 2007·No. 05-51351·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 24, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-51351 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARTIN CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-45-4 --------------------

Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Martin Castillo has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Castillo has

filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, the

response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Castillo, (5th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Castillo (United States v. Castillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)