United States v. Castillo
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 24, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-51351 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
MARTIN CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-45-4 --------------------
Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Martin Castillo has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance
with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Castillo has
filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief, the
response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Castillo (United States v. Castillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.