United States v. Castellano
71 M.J. 445, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 1171
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided October 17, 2012·No. No. 12-0684/MC·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
CCA 201100248. Review granted on the following issue:
IN MILLER v. CALIFORNIA, THE SUPREME COURT HELD THAT THE TRIER OF FACT MUST DETERMINE WHETHER JUDICIALLY-CREATED FACTORS THAT DISTINGUISH BETWEEN CONSTITUTIONALLY-PROTECTED AND CRIMINAL CONDUCT ARE SATISFIED. THE FACTORS IDENTIFIED IN UNITED STATES v. MAR-CUM ARE AN EXAMPLE OF SUCH FACTORS BUT THE LOWER COURT HELD THAT THE MILITARY JUDGE MUST DETERMINE WHETHER THE MARCUM FACTORS ARE SATISFIED. WHO DETERMINES WHETHER THEY HAVE BEEN SATISFIED?
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Castellano, 71 M.J. 445, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 1171 (Ark. 2012).
71 M.J. 445 (United States v. Castellano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Castellano
72 M.J. 217 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2013)