United States v. Castano

217 F.3d 889, 2000 WL 913416
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 6, 2000
Docket98-20406
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 217 F.3d 889 (United States v. Castano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Castano, 217 F.3d 889, 2000 WL 913416 (5th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before POLITZ, SMITH and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In its petition for panel rehearing, the government now confesses error and takes the position that Castaño is entitled to relief. Accordingly, on the basis of the government’s request, the petition for rehearing is GRANTED, and the panel opinion, 211 F.3d 871 (5th Cir.2000), is WITHDRAWN. The order denying the motion to vacate sentence is REVERSED, and the judgment of conviction and sentence is VACATED and REMANDED for re-entry of judgment and the opportunity to appeal that new judgment. See Mack v. Smith, 659 F.2d 23, 26 (5th Cir. Unit A Oct.1981) (per curiam).

We express no view on the legal propriety of the government’s concession or on *890 what action this court should take once any appeal from the new judgment is filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Curry
Fifth Circuit, 2025
United States v. Castano
Fifth Circuit, 2001

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 F.3d 889, 2000 WL 913416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-castano-ca5-2000.