United States v. Castaneda
This text of United States v. Castaneda (United States v. Castaneda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-20699 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM CASTANEDA,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CR-H-94-144-2 - - - - - - - - - - May 1, 1996
Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
William Castaneda contends that the district court erred in
increasing his offense level by two levels pursuant to U.S.S.G.
§ 3B1.1(c). Based upon a careful review of the record and the
arguments of the parties, we hold that application of the
§ 3B1.1(c) adjustment was not clearly erroneous. United States
v. Alvarado, 898 F.2d 987, 993-94 (5th Cir. 1990).
AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Castaneda, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-castaneda-ca5-1996.