United States v. Cassell

20 F. App'x 224
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 15, 2001
DocketNo. 01-4066
StatusPublished

This text of 20 F. App'x 224 (United States v. Cassell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Cassell, 20 F. App'x 224 (4th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The notice of appeal in this case was received in the district court shortly after expiration of the appeal period. Under Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2879, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988), the notice is considered filed as of the date Appellant delivered it to prison officials for forwarding to the court. The record does not reveal when Appellant delivered the notice of appeal for mailing to the court. Accordingly, we remand the case for the district court to obtain this information from the parties and determine the timeliness of the filing under Houston v. Lack and consider whether Appellant’s notice may be construed as a motion pursuant to Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4). The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Houston v. Lack
487 U.S. 266 (Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 F. App'x 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cassell-ca4-2001.