United States v. Cash
This text of United States v. Cash (United States v. Cash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7698
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
MICHAEL SCOTT CASH,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge. (6:05-cv-00338-MBS; 6:99-cr-00266-MB)
Submitted: April 21, 2011 Decided: April 26, 2011
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Scott Cash, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac Louis Johnson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Michael Scott Cash appeals the district court’s orders
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on Cash’s motion to return property and denying Cash’s
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cash,
Nos. 6:05-cv-00338-MBS; 6:99-cr-00266-MB (D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2010;
July 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Cash, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cash-ca4-2011.