United States v. Cash

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Cash

425 F. App'x 200

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 26, 2011·No. No. 10-7698·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Scott Cash appeals the district court’s orders adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Cash’s motion to return property and denying Cash’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cash, Nos. 6:05-cv-00338-MBS; 6:99-cr-00266-MB (D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2010); 2010 WL 2650022 (July 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael Scott Cash appeals the district court’s orders adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Cash’s motion to return property and denying Cash’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cash, Nos. 6:05-cv-00338-MBS; 6:99-cr-00266-MB (D.S.C. Oct. 21, 2010); 2010 WL 2650022 (July 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Cash, 425 F. App'x 200 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

425 F. App'x 200 (United States v. Cash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.