United States v. Casas
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 02-1623
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,
v.
RALPH CASAS,
Defendant, Appellant.
No. 02-1624
FELICIANO NIEVES,
Nos. 02-1785 02-1674
WINSTON CUNNINGHAM,
Defendant, Appellant. No. 02-1794
RAFAEL SEGUI-RODRIGUEZ,
ERRATA SHEET
The opinion of this Court issued on January 20, 2004 is amended as follows:
At p. 41, l. 9, add "We note that Cunningham has not argued that the evidence was insufficient."
At p. 55, l. 12, add "and the United States is free to retry Cunningham if it so chooses. See Montana v. Hall, 481 U.S. 400, 402 (1987); Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1, 6 (1978); Ball v. United States, 163 U.S. 662, 672 (1896)."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
356 F.3d 104 (United States v. Casas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.