United States v. Casas

356 F.3d 104
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Casas. Read the opinion of the Court — 356 F.3d 104
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided March 2, 2004·No. 02-1623·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 02-1623

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

RALPH CASAS,

Defendant, Appellant.

No. 02-1624

FELICIANO NIEVES,

Nos. 02-1785 02-1674

WINSTON CUNNINGHAM,

Defendant, Appellant. No. 02-1794

RAFAEL SEGUI-RODRIGUEZ,

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on January 20, 2004 is amended as follows:

At p. 41, l. 9, add "We note that Cunningham has not argued that the evidence was insufficient."

At p. 55, l. 12, add "and the United States is free to retry Cunningham if it so chooses. See Montana v. Hall, 481 U.S. 400, 402 (1987); Burks v. United States, 437 U.S. 1, 6 (1978); Ball v. United States, 163 U.S. 662, 672 (1896)."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Casas, 356 F.3d 104 (1st Cir. 2004).

356 F.3d 104 (United States v. Casas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Ball
163 U.S. 662 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Burks v. United States
437 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1978)
Montana v. Hall
481 U.S. 400 (Supreme Court, 1987)