United States v. Casares

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 4, 2001
Docket00-40680
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Casares (United States v. Casares) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Casares, (5th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40680 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus

ALFONSO CASARES,

Defendant-Appellant. __________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-00-CR-20-2 __________________________________________ June 1, 2001

Before POLITZ, DAVIS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Alfonso Casares appeals his jury conviction for conspiracy to commit money

laundering. He argues that there is insufficient evidence to support his conviction.

He also argues that the district court’s written judgment, in addition to referring to

18 U.S.C. § 1956(h), erroneously cites to § 1956(a)(1)(A)(i) when it should have cited to § 1956(a)(1)(B)(i).

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. After reviewing the briefs of the parties and the evidence adduced at trial, we hold that a rational trier of fact could have concluded beyond a reasonable doubt

that Casares conspired to commit money laundering. See United States v. Ortega

Reyna, 148 F.3d 540, 543 (5th Cir. 1998); see also United States v. Wilson, ___ F.3d ___ (5th Cir. Apr. 19, 2001, No. 00-20041), 2001 WL 396700 at *11 (listing

elements of offense). With regard to Casares’ second argument, the Government

concedes that the judgment’s citation to 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(A)(i) was error

which should be corrected. Accordingly, we AFFIRM Casares’ conviction but REMAND the case to the district court so that the judgment’s citation to 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(A)(i) can be deleted and replaced with a citation to 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1)(B)(i). See United States v. Sapp, 439 F.2d 817, 821 (5th Cir. 1971).

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Reyna
148 F.3d 540 (Fifth Circuit, 1998)
United States v. Frank Sapp
439 F.2d 817 (Fifth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. George L.J. Wilson
249 F.3d 366 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Casares, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-casares-ca5-2001.