United States v. Caruso
553 F.2d 94
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided February 18, 1977·No. 76-1479·Published·Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
553 F.2d 94
U. S.
v.
Caruso
No. 76-1422, 76-1479, 76-1492, 76-1553, 76-1554, 76-1578
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
2/18/77
S.D.N.Y., 415 F.Supp. 847
AFFIRMED*
*
Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opinion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0.23
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Caruso, 553 F.2d 94 (2d Cir. 1977).
553 F.2d 94 (United States v. Caruso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Venuti
625 F. Supp. 1460 (S.D. New York, 1986)
United States v. Massino
605 F. Supp. 1565 (S.D. New York, 1985)
State v. Burstein
427 A.2d 525 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1981)
United States v. Diana
605 F.2d 1307 (Fourth Circuit, 1979)
United States v. Antonio Cruz Vazquez, Benito Luis Cortina, Antonio Gonzalez, Andres Rene Rappard, and Jose De La Fe-Quintas
605 F.2d 1269 (Second Circuit, 1979)
United States v. Webster
473 F. Supp. 586 (D. Maryland, 1979)
United States v. Aloi
449 F. Supp. 698 (E.D. New York, 1977)
United States v. Donald J. Angelini, Dominic Cortina, Joseph Spadavecchio, Salvatore J. Molose, Nick Camillo, John La Placa and Frank Aureli
565 F.2d 469 (Seventh Circuit, 1977)