United States v. Carty

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Carty

462 F.3d 1066, 2006 WL 2474346

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 23, 2006·No. Nos. 05-10200, 05-30120·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these eases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinions shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

These matters are consolidated for purposes of en banc rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these eases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinions shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

These matters are consolidated for purposes of en banc rehearing.

United States v. Carty, 462 F.3d 1066, 2006 WL 2474346 (9th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

462 F.3d 1066 (United States v. Carty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related