United States v. Cartwright
This text of 48 F. App'x 660 (United States v. Cartwright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Marfus Tyrone Cartwright appeals the district court’s revocation of his supervised release, arising from his underlying conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine, possession with intent to distribute cocaine, and aiding and abetting.
Cartwright’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has moved to withdraw as counsel of record. Cartwright did not file a pro se supplemental brief. Because our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), reveals no arguable issues, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm the revocation of Cartwright’s supervised release.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 F. App'x 660, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cartwright-ca9-2002.