United States v. Carter

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Carter. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 F. App'x 294
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 23, 2001·No. 00-41002·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-41002 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DARYL DEWAYNE CARTER,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:00-CR-5-1 -------------------- August 23, 2001

Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel representing Daryl Dewayne Carter

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Carter was provided with a copy of counsel’s Anders motion and

brief. Carter has filed a response asserting that the district

court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his

guilty plea and that counsel was ineffective.

Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and

Carter’s response shows that there are no nonfrivolous issues for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 00-41002 -2-

appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Carter, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Carter (United States v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)