United States v. Carter

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 21, 2004
Docket04-7029
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Carter (United States v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Carter, (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7029

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CORNEIL LEON CARTER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-02-463)

Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 21, 2004

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corneil Leon Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Friel Stokes, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Corneil Leon Carter appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for transcripts at government expense. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United

States v. Carter, No. CR-02-463 (E.D. Va. filed May 11, 2004 &

entered May 12, 2004. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Carter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carter-ca4-2004.