United States v. Carter

322 F. App'x 824
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Carter. Read the opinion of the Court — 566 F.3d 970
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 8, 2009·No. No. 08-15775·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James H. Burke, Jr., appointed counsel for Eugene Donzel Carter in this appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Carter’s sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Carter, 322 F. App'x 824 (11th Cir. 2009).

322 F. App'x 824 (United States v. Carter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)