United States v. Carter

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

United States v. Carter

74 M.J. 55, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 1258

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces

DecidedOctober 23, 2014

DocketNo. 14-0792/AR

StatusPublished

This text of 74 M.J. 55 (United States v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Carter, 74 M.J. 55, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 1258 (Ark. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

CCA 2012 1046. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HER DISCRETION BY PREVENTING DEFENSE COUNSEL FROM PRESENTING FACTS OF APPELLANT’S UNLAWFUL PRETRIAL PUNISHMENT AS MITIGATION EVIDENCE AT SENTENCING.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 2012 1046. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HER DISCRETION BY PREVENTING DEFENSE COUNSEL FROM PRESENTING FACTS OF APPELLANT’S UNLAWFUL PRETRIAL PUNISHMENT AS MITIGATION EVIDENCE AT SENTENCING.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 M.J. 55, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 1258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carter-armfor-2014.