United States v. Cartagena

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cartagena. Read the opinion of the Court — 593 F.3d 104 →

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided February 9, 2010·No. 08-2177·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 08-2177

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

JULIO CARTAGENA,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on January 29, 2010 is amended as follows:

On p. 7, line 23: Replace "three consecutive 150 month terms" with "three concurrent 150 month terms".

On p. 13, n. 4, line 1: Replace "Although we agree with the district court's decision to suppress" with "Although we agree with the district court's decision not to suppress".

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 08-2177

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

JULIO CARTAGENA,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on January 29, 2010 is amended as follows:

On p. 7, line 23: Replace "three consecutive 150 month terms" with "three concurrent 150 month terms".

On p. 13, n. 4, line 1: Replace "Although we agree with the district court's decision to suppress" with "Although we agree with the district court's decision not to suppress".

United States v. Cartagena, (1st Cir. 2010).

Pincite

United States v. Cartagena (United States v. Cartagena) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.