United States v. Carruthers

486 F. App'x 340
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 16, 2012·No. No. 12-7302·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Cory Aubrey Carruthers appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to extend the appeal period for the district court’s April 25, 2012, order denying his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2012) motion. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Carruthers’ informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Car-ruthers has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm the district court’s order denying the motion for an extension of the appeal period. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Carruthers, 486 F. App'x 340 (4th Cir. 2012).

486 F. App'x 340 (United States v. Carruthers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related