United States v. Carroll

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Carroll. Read the opinion of the Court — 227 F.3d 486
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 2, 2001·No. 01-30302·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30302 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MATTHEW CARROLL,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 97-CR-60030-2 -------------------- July 31, 2001

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Matthew Carroll has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Carroll has filed a response to

counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the brief, Carroll’s

response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Carroll, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Carroll (United States v. Carroll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)