United States v. Carroll

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 12, 1996·No. 96-40028·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40028 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SHANNON CARROLL,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:95-CR-23 - - - - - - - - - - July 5, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Shannon Carroll appeals his sentence following a guilty plea

for possession with intent to distribute cocaine. Carroll argues

that the district clearly erred in making the factual

determinations that he possessed firearms during the commission

of the offense and that he exercised a leadership role in the

offense.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-40028 - 2 -

Several firearms were found in Carroll’s residence which was

also where Carroll stored cocaine and where he received telephone

calls regarding drug transactions. This is a sufficient nexus to

allow the firearm adjustment. United States v. Mergerson, 4 F.2d

337, 350 (5th Cir. 1993), cert. denied 114 S. Ct. 1310 (1994).

Carroll employed at least one other person, and more likely two

people, during his course of conduct. All Carroll’s relevant

conduct, and not just the transaction at issue, was pertinent to

this leadership adjustment. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1, intro.

comment. The district court did not clearly err in its

sentencing findings.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Carroll, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Carroll (United States v. Carroll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related