United States v. Carrizosa-Hernandez

8 F. App'x 712
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 19, 2001
DocketNo. 99-50416; D.C. No. CR-98-762-DMT
StatusPublished

This text of 8 F. App'x 712 (United States v. Carrizosa-Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Carrizosa-Hernandez, 8 F. App'x 712 (9th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Octavio Carrizosa-Hernandez appeals the 60-month sentence imposed after his guilty plea to being an illegal alien found in the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Carrivosa-Hernandez contends that a sentence in excess of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)’s two-year statutory maximum based on the fact, not proven to a jury, that his deportation occurred following commission of an aggravated felony violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). This argument is foreclosed by United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir.2000), amended (Feb. 8, 2001) (order). See United States v. Castillo-Rivera, 244 F.3d 1020,1024 (9th Cir.2001).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)
United States v. Castillo-Rivera
244 F.3d 1020 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 F. App'x 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carrizosa-hernandez-ca9-2001.