United States v. Carrington

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Carrington. Read the opinion of the Court — 411 F. App'x 644
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 5, 2009·No. 09-6173·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6173

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TRAVIS LE-RON CARRINGTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00388-JRS-2)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 5, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Travis Le-Ron Carrington, Appellant Pro Se. Nicholas Stephan Altimari, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Travis Le-Ron Carrington appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for sentence reduction pursuant to

Amendment 706. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. United States v. Carrington, No. 3:00-

cr-00388-JRS-2 (E.D. Va. Jan 15, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Carrington, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Carrington (United States v. Carrington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.