United States v. Carpenter, Carlos
137 F. App'x 909
Opinion
Order
Our decision of May 6, 2005, affirmed Carpenter’s conviction while reserving final disposition of the sentence. On a limited remand under United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471 (7th Cir.2005), the district judge stated that he would have imposed a lower sentence had he realized that he possesses additional discretion.. Both sides have filed memoranda asking us to remand for resentencing. Accordingly, as the parties have agreed, the sentence is vacated and the case is remanded for re-sentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Carpenter, Carlos, 137 F. App'x 909 (7th Cir. 2005).
137 F. App'x 909 (United States v. Carpenter, Carlos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.