United States v. Carpenter

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Carpenter. Read the opinion of the Court — 781 F.3d 599
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided December 16, 2013·No. 19-1346·Errata

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 11-2131

UNITED STATES,

Appellant,

v.

DANIEL E. CARPENTER,

Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on November 25, 2013 is amended as follows:

On page 6, lines 9-12, the sentence beginning with "The 3% choice" is struck and replaced with: "The 3% choice, which was selected for the majority of the funds in the case, was initially called a 'Merrill Lynch Ready Asset Money Market Account' in several of the documents, including the account selection form and the Escrow Agreement that some exchangors signed, until Merrill Lynch suspended Carpenter's trading privileges and he opened new accounts at PaineWebber."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Carpenter, (1st Cir. 2013).

United States v. Carpenter (United States v. Carpenter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.