United States v. Carolyn Boehm-McCauley

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 2, 2018
Docket17-41167
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Carolyn Boehm-McCauley (United States v. Carolyn Boehm-McCauley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Carolyn Boehm-McCauley, (5th Cir. 2018).

Opinion

Case: 17-41167 Document: 00514708523 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/02/2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 17-41167 FILED Summary Calendar November 2, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CAROLYN BOEHM-MCCAULEY,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:12-CR-14-1

Before JOLLY, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Carolyn Boehm-McCauley (McCauley) seeks to appeal the denial of her motion, brought under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2), to modify a condition of supervised release that prohibits her from associating with convicted felons. She argues that she should be allowed to associate with her close friend Steven William Douglas, a convicted felon who was involved with the wire fraud crime

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 17-41167 Document: 00514708523 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/02/2018

No. 17-41167

for which McCauley is currently on supervised release. The Government moves for summary dismissal. McCauley’s plea agreement contained a broad waiver of appeal that bars her appeal from the denial of the § 3583(e)(2) motion. See United States v. Scallon, 683 F.3d 680, 683-84 (5th Cir. 2012). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary dismissal is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED. The Government’s alternative motion for additional time for briefing is DENIED AS MOOT.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Harold Scallon
683 F.3d 680 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Carolyn Boehm-McCauley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carolyn-boehm-mccauley-ca5-2018.