United States v. Carmine J. Persico, Jr.
This text of 467 F.2d 485 (United States v. Carmine J. Persico, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
467 F.2d 485
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Carmine J. PERSICO, Jr., Appellant.
No. 87, Docket 72-1472.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Oct. 18, 1972.
Decided Oct. 20, 1972.
Maurice Edelbaum, New York City (Henry J. Boitel, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Shirley Baccus-Lobel, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Robert A. Morse, U. S. Atty., E. D. New York, Denis E. Dillon, James O. Druker, Sidney Glazer, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee.
Before MANSFIELD, OAKES and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The order of the district court denying defendant Persico's motion for a new trial is affirmed upon Judge Travia's detailed opinion at 339 F.Supp. 1077 (E.D.N.Y.1972).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
467 F.2d 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carmine-j-persico-jr-ca2-1972.