United States v. Carmine Di Salvo
This text of 283 F.2d 865 (United States v. Carmine Di Salvo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
283 F.2d 865
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Carmine DI SALVO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 139, Docket 26297.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued Nov. 3, 1960.
Decided Nov. 16, 1960.
Frances Kahn, New York City, for defendant-appellant.
S. Hazard Gillespie, Jr., U.S. Atty., for Southern District of New York, New York City, Samuel Sheres and George I. Gordon, Asst. U.S. Attys., New York City, of counsel, for United States of America.
Before SWAN, CLARK and MEDINA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
A motion for bail pending appeal was denied by Judge Murphy on the ground that the appeal, if taken, would be frivolous. We agree. The record presents no question of law worthy of discussion. Judgement affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 F.2d 865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carmine-di-salvo-ca2-1960.