United States v. Carlton J. Smith

859 F.2d 1200, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14583, 1988 WL 112887
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Carlton J. Smith. Read the opinion of the Court — 851 F.2d 706
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 19, 1988·No. 87-5683·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The appellee’s petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc were submitted to this Court. In a requested poll of the Court, Judges Russell, Widener, Chapman, Wilkinson and Wilkins voted to rehear the case in banc; and Judges Winter, Hall, Phillips, Murnaghan, Sprouse and Er-vin voted against rehearing the case in banc. As a majority of the judges voted to deny rehearing in bane, and

As the panel considered the petition for rehearing and is of the opinion that it should be denied,

IT IS ADJUDGED AND ORDERED that the petition for rehearing and suggestion for rehearing in banc are denied.

Entered at the direction of Judge Winter, with the concurrence of Judge Spencer, United States District Judge, sitting by designation. Judge Chapman dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Carlton J. Smith, 859 F.2d 1200, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14583, 1988 WL 112887 (4th Cir. 1988).

859 F.2d 1200 (United States v. Carlton J. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.