United States v. Carlos Santos Perez-Estrada

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Carlos Santos Perez-Estrada

29 F.3d 636

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 4, 1994·No. 93-50378·Unpublished

Opinion

29 F.3d 636w

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Carlos Santos PEREZ-ESTRADA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-50378.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 18, 1994.^*
Decided July 21, 1994.
Memorandum Withdrawn on Denial of Rehearing and Suggestion for
Rehearing en banc Nov. 4, 1994.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

29 F.3d 636w

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Carlos Santos PEREZ-ESTRADA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-50378.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted July 18, 1994.^*
Decided July 21, 1994.
Memorandum Withdrawn on Denial of Rehearing and Suggestion for
Rehearing en banc Nov. 4, 1994.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

United States v. Carlos Santos Perez-Estrada, 29 F.3d 636 (9th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

29 F.3d 636 (United States v. Carlos Santos Perez-Estrada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.