United States v. Carlos Sanchez
This text of 35 F. App'x 291 (United States v. Carlos Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Carlos Corral-Sanchez pleaded guilty to re-entering the United States illegally after deportation, following his conviction for an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). The district court 1 sentenced Corral-Sanchez to 46 months imprisonment and 2 years supervised release. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and has filed a brief arguing that the district court erred in denying Corral-Sanchez a downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0, on the basis of cultural assimilation.
Counsel’s argument is unreviewable because the district court made a purely discretionary decision not to depart on this basis. See United States v. Edwards, 225 F.3d 991, 992-93 (8th Cir.2000), cert. denied, 531 U.S. 1100, 121 S.Ct. 834, 148 L.Ed.2d 715 (2001). Further, following our independent review, see Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues.
Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
A true copy.
. The HONORABLE ROBERT W. PRATT, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 F. App'x 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carlos-sanchez-ca8-2002.