United States v. Carlos Gonzales, Jr.

131 F.3d 149, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 38888
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedNovember 21, 1997
Docket17-35932
StatusUnpublished

This text of 131 F.3d 149 (United States v. Carlos Gonzales, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Carlos Gonzales, Jr., 131 F.3d 149, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 38888 (9th Cir. 1997).

Opinion

131 F.3d 149

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Carlos GONZALES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

N. 97-30137.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 21, 1997.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington; D.C. No. CR-88-00335-AAM; Alan A. McDonald, District Judge, Presiding.

Before: HUG, Chief Judge, PREGERSCN and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM*

Carlos Rodriguez Gonzales appeals the district court's judgment which amended his sentence after he violated the terms of his supervised release. The government agrees the district court erred by imposing an additional term of supervised release to follow the 18 month prison term imposed upon Gonzales, and requests that we remand for resentencing. In light of our recent opinion in United States v. Collins, 118 F.3d 1394 (9th Cir.1997), we affirm the portion of Gonzales's sentence that provides for incarceration, reverse the portion that imposes an additional term of supervised release, and remand with instructions to the district court to vacate the supervised release portion of the amended sentence.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

**

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 F.3d 149, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 38888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carlos-gonzales-jr-ca9-1997.