United States v. Carlos Arredondo

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 9, 2018·No. 17-40058·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 17-40058 Document: 00514421247 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/09/2018

REVISED April 9, 2018

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

United States Court of Appeals

No. 17-40058

Fifth Circuit

FILED

Summary Calendar March 28, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Clerk

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CARLOS ALFREDO ARREDONDO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:16-CR-413-1

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Carlos Alfredo Arredondo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Arredondo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Case: 17-40058 Document: 00514421247 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/09/2018

No. 17-40058

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Carlos Arredondo, (5th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Carlos Arredondo (United States v. Carlos Arredondo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)