United States v. Carlisle

418 F.2d 921
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 5, 1970
DocketNos. 586-69, 587-69
StatusPublished

This text of 418 F.2d 921 (United States v. Carlisle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Carlisle, 418 F.2d 921 (10th Cir. 1970).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On review of the record in these cases and the briefs of the parties submitted under Rule 10, we conclude that the appellate issues presented are without merit and so insubstantial as to not require oral argument. The judgments are therefore affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum decision of the district court. 303 F.Supp. 627.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Carlisle
303 F. Supp. 627 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
418 F.2d 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carlisle-ca10-1970.