United States v. Carlisle
418 F.2d 921
Opinion
On review of the record in these cases and the briefs of the parties submitted under Rule 10, we conclude that the appellate issues presented are without merit and so insubstantial as to not require oral argument. The judgments are therefore affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum decision of the district court. 303 F.Supp. 627.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Carlisle, 418 F.2d 921 (10th Cir. 1970).
418 F.2d 921 (United States v. Carlisle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Carlisle
303 F. Supp. 627 (W.D. Oklahoma, 1969)