United States v. Carla Jackson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 30, 2025
Docket24-11785
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Carla Jackson (United States v. Carla Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Carla Jackson, (11th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-11785 Document: 53-2 Date Filed: 01/30/2025 Page: 1 of 2

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-11785 ____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARLA JACKSON, TELDRIN FOSTER,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:20-cr-00296-JPB-CMS-5 ____________________

Before JORDAN and LUCK, Circuit Judges. USCA11 Case: 24-11785 Document: 53-2 Date Filed: 01/30/2025 Page: 2 of 2

2 Order of the Court 24-11785

BY THE COURT: Teldrin Foster has filed two appeals in this criminal action. His first appeal is from the July 27, 2024, final judgment for his con- victions and sentence. On November 1, 2024, he filed a second ap- peal from the district court’s October 28, 2024, order denying his motion for a new trial. A jurisdictional question asked the parties whether Foster has standing to appeal the October 28 order. Foster responds that he has standing to appeal his convictions and sentence because they aggrieved him. The government responds that Foster does not have standing to appeal the October 28 order. Foster does not have standing to appeal the October 28 or- der because he expressly requested the district court to deny his motion for a new trial, and the district court granted his request without any deviation. See Wolff v. Cash 4 Titles, 351 F.3d 1348, 1353 (11th Cir. 2003); United States v. Pavlenko, 921 F.3d 1286, 1289 (11th Cir. 2019). On the other hand, Foster has standing to appeal the final judgment because he was aggrieved by his convictions and sentence of imprisonment. See Wolff, 351 F.3d at 1353-54; Nation- wide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Barrow, 29 F.4th 1299, 1301 (11th Cir. 2022). Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED IN PART as to the October 28, 2024, order and may proceed as to Foster’s convictions and sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wolff v. Cash 4 Titles
351 F.3d 1348 (Eleventh Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Stanislav Pavlenko
921 F.3d 1286 (Eleventh Circuit, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Carla Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carla-jackson-ca11-2025.