United States v. Carl Walker

488 F. App'x 176
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 27, 2012
Docket12-1528
StatusUnpublished

This text of 488 F. App'x 176 (United States v. Carl Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Carl Walker, 488 F. App'x 176 (8th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Carl Dean Walker appeals the district court’s 1 reimposition of two special conditions of supervised release following our remand, see United States v. Walker, 450 Fed.Appx. 544 (8th Cir.2011) (remanding for individualized findings with regard to three special conditions of supervised release). Having carefully reviewed the re-sentencing transcript, we find that the two challenged special conditions, regarding sex offender treatment and internet usage, are reasonably related to the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), involve no greater deprivation of liberty than necessary, and are consistent with pertinent policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d) (setting forth the standard for issuing special conditions of supervised release); United States v. Morais, 670 F.3d 889, 895 (8th Cir.2012) (approving analogous provision regarding internet usage); United States v. Poitra, 648 F.3d 884, 888-89 (8th Cir.2011) (approving similar condition regarding sex offender treatment). Further, following our remand, the district court made adequate individualized find *178 ings with regard to the necessity of each condition. Accordingly, we affirm.

1

. The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Poitra
648 F.3d 884 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Carl Walker
450 F. App'x 544 (Eighth Circuit, 2011)
United States v. Morais
670 F.3d 889 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
488 F. App'x 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carl-walker-ca8-2012.