United States v. Carl Sutton, Jr.

Sixth Circuit

United States v. Carl Sutton, Jr.

642 F.2d 1001, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 10632

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedNovember 7, 1979

Docket78-5134-5-6-7-8-9-41-2-3

StatusPublished

This text of 642 F.2d 1001 (United States v. Carl Sutton, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Carl Sutton, Jr., 642 F.2d 1001, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 10632 (6th Cir. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

642 F.2d 1001

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Carl SUTTON, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 78-5134-5-6-7-8-9-41-2-3 and 78-5074.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 7, 1979.

ORDER

A majority of the judges of this Court in regular service have voted for rehearing of these cases en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court, 605 F.2d 260, is vacated, the mandate is stayed and these cases are restored to the docket as pending appeals.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and the cases will be scheduled during the February, 1980 session.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI