United States v. Carl Sutton, Jr.

642 F.2d 1001, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 10632
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided November 7, 1979·No. 78-5134-5-6-7-8-9-41-2-3·Published

Opinion

642 F.2d 1001

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Carl SUTTON, Jr., et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 78-5134-5-6-7-8-9-41-2-3 and 78-5074.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Nov. 7, 1979.

ORDER

A majority of the judges of this Court in regular service have voted for rehearing of these cases en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court, 605 F.2d 260, is vacated, the mandate is stayed and these cases are restored to the docket as pending appeals.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and the cases will be scheduled during the February, 1980 session.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Carl Sutton, Jr., 642 F.2d 1001, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 10632 (6th Cir. 1979).

642 F.2d 1001 (United States v. Carl Sutton, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Sutton
642 F.2d 1001 (Sixth Circuit, 1979)