United States v. Carl Johannes Anderson
467 F.2d 210
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 6, 1972
Docket72-1948
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 467 F.2d 210 (United States v. Carl Johannes Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Carl Johannes Anderson, 467 F.2d 210 (9th Cir. 1972).
Opinion
Appellant contends that compelling a conscientious objector to perform civilian work violates the First and Thirteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. United States v. Campbell, 439 F.2d 1087 (9th Cir. 1971), holds to the contrary.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bobilin v. Board of Education, State of Hawaii
403 F. Supp. 1095 (D. Hawaii, 1975)
United States v. Louis Edward Jennings
473 F.2d 999 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
467 F.2d 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carl-johannes-anderson-ca9-1972.