United States v. Carl Johannes Anderson

467 F.2d 210
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 6, 1972·No. 72-1948·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant contends that compelling a conscientious objector to perform civilian work violates the First and Thirteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. United States v. Campbell, 439 F.2d 1087 (9th Cir. 1971), holds to the contrary.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Carl Johannes Anderson, 467 F.2d 210 (9th Cir. 1972).

467 F.2d 210 (United States v. Carl Johannes Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bobilin v. Board of Education, State of Hawaii
403 F. Supp. 1095 (D. Hawaii, 1975)
United States v. Louis Edward Jennings
473 F.2d 999 (Ninth Circuit, 1973)