United States v. Carl Ernest Johnson, Jr.

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Carl Ernest Johnson, Jr.

439 F.2d 700, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11734

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 22, 1971·No. 26247·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Johnson refused induction into the military service at a reception center. There for the first time he began to assert he was a conscientious objector and to plead that he was about to become a father.

After the refusal, he did file his claims with the local board. That was too late. *701 See Blades v. United States, 9 Cir., 407 F.2d 1397.

Also, there was a failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Johnson refused induction into the military service at a reception center. There for the first time he began to assert he was a conscientious objector and to plead that he was about to become a father.

After the refusal, he did file his claims with the local board. That was too late. *701 See Blades v. United States, 9 Cir., 407 F.2d 1397.

Also, there was a failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

United States v. Carl Ernest Johnson, Jr., 439 F.2d 700, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11734 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

439 F.2d 700 (United States v. Carl Ernest Johnson, Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related