United States v. Carl Ernest Johnson, Jr.
This text of 439 F.2d 700 (United States v. Carl Ernest Johnson, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Johnson refused induction into the military service at a reception center. There for the first time he began to assert he was a conscientious objector and to plead that he was about to become a father.
After the refusal, he did file his claims with the local board. That was too late. *701 See Blades v. United States, 9 Cir., 407 F.2d 1397.
Also, there was a failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
439 F.2d 700, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 11734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-carl-ernest-johnson-jr-ca9-1971.